My Ex-Spouse Got the House in Our Minnesota Divorce, am I Still Responsible for the Mortgage?

If your name was included on the original home mortgage, and you signed the loan agreement, you remain accountable for the payment of the loan even if your ex-spouse got the house in your divorce.

This is true even if your divorce decree says that your spouse agrees to take on the mortgage payment and “hold you harmless.”  The inclusion of that language in a divorce decree is meaningless to the lender, and most lenders will ignore it.  The lender is not a party to your divorce decree, so your divorce does not impact your outstanding debt to the lender.  What this does do is that if the spouse awarded the house defaults, the other spouse can sue under the “hold harmless or indemnify” provision.  Again, you can’t go after the lender, but you can sue your ex spouse.

In many cases, this will not be an issue.  The spouse awarded the homestead will pay the mortgage as agreed.  However, it can become a problem if the spouse awarded the homestead discontinues paying the mortgage.  At that time, the lender will likely attempt to collect the outstanding debt from you.

A Minnesota trial judge said, “People who sign documents which are plainly written must expect to be held liable thereon.  Otherwise, written documents would be entirely worthless and chaos would  prevail in our business relations.”   Watkins Products Inc., v. Butterfield, 144 N.W.2d 56, 274 Minn. 378 (Minn. 1966).  In signing the original loan agreement, you agreed to the terms of the loan note and your signature indicates your agreement with the terms of repayment.

A solution would be to have your spouse agree to refinance the loan in his or her name.  This would remove you as a co-lender, leaving only your ex-spouse responsible for repayment.  This will not only prevent any future damage to your credit should your ex-spouse fail to make payments, but also discontinue any responsibility you have to the loan.

Another option is to simply sell the home.  But, if there is no equity, all you are left with could be the “hold harmless and indemnify” language (see above).  In summary, you need to know what the consequences are of a provision that states that your ex spouse will hold you harmless and indemnify you.

Schedule Now

Farhan Hassan headshot

By Farhan Hassan

January 9, 2014

Should you use a Neutral Financial Expert or your own Expert in your Minnesota Divorce?

Financial experts can be very useful in Minnesota divorce proceedings, especially when there are non-marital claims or complicated financial assets.…

Marital Property

Under Minnesota divorce law, any asset acquired after marriage by either party is considered marital property.  The Court has the…

Facts about retirement accounts during a Minnesota divorce

If a spouse earns retirement benefits during marriage, the other spouse has a marital interest in such assets. As a…

More on this topic

Minnesota Divorce & Debt

During a divorce, debt is divided by the Court in a “just and equitable” manner.  If one party is using a credit card to pay…

Learn more

Understanding the Implications of Dividing Retirement Assets in a Minnesota Divorce

For many divorcing couples in Minnesota, retirement assets represent the most valuable assets owned by the parties. In other words, most of the parties’ money…

Learn more

How to Divide Property During a Divorce: Asset and Debt Division in Minnesota

Highlights Property division during divorce generally involves three steps: information gathering, negotiations or mediation, and finalization. Information-gathering involves initially listing all of the assets and…

Learn more

Free confidential consultation

Whether you're contemplating divorce, facing custody challenges, or need modifications to existing orders, experienced counsel makes a difference. Schedule a consultation to discuss your specific situation and learn how we can help protect what matters most.